Year: 2013 Source: Archives of Suicide Research.(2013).17(3):302-312.DOI:10.1080/13811118.2013.777002 SIEC No: 20130828

The studies presented compare two methodologies for categorizing suicidal patients based on clinical data. Discussion follows regarding implications for risk assessment and treatment. In these studies, 52 outpatient subjects were placed into different groups based on coding their Òsuicidal motivationÓ (Study 1) and their Òinternal struggleÓ ratings (Study 2) using data collected at intake. Self-report ratings of 6 Suicide Status Form (SSF) Core Constructs (Psychological Pain, Stress, Agitation, Hopelessness, Self-Hate, and Overall Risk of Suicide) recorded both at intake and at completion of treatment were then compared to determine differences in Core Construct ratings among groups at different time points. In Study 1, overall differences among motivation groups (Life-motivated, Ambivalent, and Death-motivated) were significant for ratings at treatment completion of Overall Risk of Suicide, Self-Hate, and Psychological Pain. In Study 2, overall differences among groups (Wish to live, Ambivalent, and Wish to die) were significant for ratings at intake of Overall Risk of Suicide. At completion of treatment, overall differences among groups were significant for ratings of Overall Risk of Suicide, Hopelessness, and Self-Hate. In addition, significant interactions were found between test time and group for Overall Risk of Suicide and Self-Hate. Results suggest that categorizing suicidal patients by motivation and by the nature of their internal struggle could be beneficial to differential risk assessment with implications for clinical treatment.

Contact us for a copy of this article, or view online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253331963_Assessing_and_Treating_Different_Suicidal_States_in_a_Danish_Outpatient_Sample?ev=publicSearchHeader&_sg=-BiSQa97GUSaAK_a2artwPx5KQC4RBssYWYMme5vvpgSfdzdwNkjlpowdPAqHThlPoenBLK8swPxnR0