Mad, bad or heroic? Gender, Identity and accountability in lay portrayals of suicide in late twentieth-century England.

Suicide research has relied heavily on the psychological autopsy method, which uses interviews with the bereaved to ascertain the mental health status of the deceased prior to death. The resulting data are typically interpreted within a clinical diagnostic framework, which reinforces psychiatric assumptions concerning the ubiquity of mental illness amongst those who take their own lives. The ways in which informants reconstruct the past and the meanings they attach to events preceding the suicide are rarely examined. This paper uses qualitative methods to analyse the narratives given by bereaved people in an English psychological autopsy study, in order to understand how they made sense of a family memberÕs suicide. Some clear differences between the portrayal of male and female suicides emerged. The paper discusses the gendering of agency and accountability in relation to the differential medicalisation of male and female distress in the UK, and suggests that a preoccupation with mental illness in suicide research may have obscured other culturally normative understandings of self-accomplished death.

Contact us for a copy of this article, or view online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221877679_Mad_Bad_or_Heroic_Gender_Identity_and_Accountability_in_Lay_Portrayals_of_Suicide_in_Late_Twentieth-Century_England?ev=publicSearchHeader&_sg=Z97mjFxuWyLJGqXWqz0n6kOmBZ0pjrjZDaHWPlGHjyUl2DTrjRGw6s7QIRPpck15vI_ftyig5yE22aU