This article notes that 19th century arguments for/against euthanasia are identical to today’s arguments & suggest 4 conclusions. Public interest in euthanasia: is not linked with advances in biomedical technology; it flourishes in times of economic recession; it arises when physician authority over medical decision-making is challenged; & it occurs when terminating life-sustaining medical interventions become standard medical practice & interest develops in extending such practices. (113 Refs.)